MCI Against Karnataka PG Medical Admission Criteria- Supreme Court informed

Published On 2018-03-17 08:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-08-18 11:37 GMT

New Delhi: A Karnataka government notification making a minimum 10-year study in the State mandatory to qualify for government seats in PG medical courses has been disapproved of on Thursday by the Medical Council of India (MCI), before the Supreme Court


Senior Advocate B.P. Patil appearing before a Bench led by Justice Arun Mishra, defended the eligibility condition for admission by citing the example of the states of U.P. and A.P. where the above condition prevails.


However, the council in its counter-argument stated that Postgraduate medical seats in government colleges are numbered and therefore are not to be subject to conditions. The State and the MCI have been directed by the bench to file individual responses.


In the course of hearing advocate Amit Kumar, representing the petitioners, sought a directive from the bench to allow the candidates, non-Kannadigas, who studied their MBBS and BDS courses from the Karnataka colleges and cleared NEET Post Graduate-2018, to get themselves registered for the counselling.


The court was hearing a petition filed by Dr. Kriti Lakhina and 39 others, wherein a request had been made by the petitioners to be allowed as non-Kannadigas to write NEET Post Graduate - 2018. The court reassured the petitioners that all would be done to safeguard their interests.







"If we allow your petition, we will do everything to protect your interest," the bench said. The petitioners contended that the eligibility criteria prescribed in the information bulletin of the Karnataka Examinations Authority on March 10 are "illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unconstitutional and thus void being in clear violation of Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution", quotes
Deccan Chronicle
.

The petitioners in their petition also stated that the state notification ruling if implemented would jeopardise the prospects of candidates who studied MBBS and BDS from Karnataka, as now only those of Karnataka origin are eligible to apply for government quota seats in government and private medical colleges in the state. They also claimed the notification was contrary to Regulation 9 of Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 framed by MCI under Section 33 of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, which stated that admission to PG courses shall be strictly on the basis of merit. The petitioners termed the eligibility condition violative of their fundamental right to life and equality and also discriminative reports the
HINDU.





The Karnataka State Information Bulletin for Centralized Counselling for Postgraduate Admissions to degree /diploma Medical and Dental Courses released a few days ago stated the following clause leading to the above petition.


In an earlier story done by Medical Dialogues, it was reported that The Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA ) Bengaluru, the official body for conducting counseling for allotment of seats for admission to Post Graduate degree courses in medical or dental courses in its official notification released during the week had come out with 'eligibility norms' under the 'candidate of Karnataka Origin' criterion in its official bulletin. The eligibility norms stated created a ripple among PG medical and dental aspirants, seeking admission in the state of Karnataka with another state domicile.



Clause

A candidate who has studied and passed in one or more Government or Government recognized, educational institutions located in the State of Karnataka for a minimum period of TEN academic years as on the 31st March 2018, commencing from 1st standard to MBBS/BDS and must have appeared and passed either SSLC/10th standard or 2nd PUC/12th standard examination from Karnataka State. In case of the candidate who has taken more than one year to pass a class or standard, the years of academic study is counted as one year only. (Documents to be produced)



.Read also: MD, MS Admissions in Karnataka: KEA Eligibility Criteria opposed

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News