This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.
×

NEET PG 2020: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Institutional quota in PG Medical admissions

................................ Advertisement ................................


NEET PG 2020: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Institutional quota in PG Medical admissions

New Delhi: In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has held that “Institutional Preference” in the Post Graduate (PG) medical admissions is permitted even after the introduction of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for PG medical courses- NEET PG.

This observation by the bench of Honorable justices Arun Mishra, Justice MR Shah and Justice BR Gavai came in view of the SLP which challenged the “Institutional Preference” in the Post Graduate Medical Courses. The petitioners had earlier moved the Gujarat High Court which didn’t rule their favour and hence they preferred the SLP with the apex court.

The petitioners challenged the validity of “institutional preference” in PG medical admissions alleged that with the introduction of NEET, which brings about the change to the effect that all admissions to the Post Graduate Medical Courses should be only on the basis of merit in the NEET, as per Regulation 9 of the Post Graduate Medical Education Admission Regulations, 2000, now “Institutional Preference” would not be permissible and the same shall be ultra vires the Medical Council Act and the Regulations, 2000 and contrary to NEET.

................................ Advertisement ................................

The purpose due to which such “Institutional Reservation” was held permissible by this Court no longer exists as now there exists 50% All India Quota and the admission is also done on the basis of NEET, the petition stated.

................................ Advertisement ................................

Even the Medical Council of India (MCI) Regulations for the Post Graduate Admissions, namely, Regulations, 2000 do not permit “Institutional Reservation”, the petition further alleged

In response to these contentions, the MCI stated that admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses in the medical colleges is done on the basis of the NEET merit and 50% seats are filled up on merit drawn on “All India basis” and 50% seats are filled up on merit drawn on “State­wise basis”. It was submitted that earlier the Gujarat University used to hold examinations for Post Graduate Medical Courses and now instead of such test by the Gujarat University, merit is to be determined on the basis of NEET examination results.

Read Also: Karnataka: Supreme Court refuses to QUASH Domicile Criteria for PG Medical Admissions in Self Financing Medical Colleges

After hearing the submissions from the both sides, the bench observed that the Institutional Preference to the extent of 50% has been approved by the Supreme Court in various judgments.

Whether after the introduction of the NEET Scheme, still the “Institutional Preference” in the Post Graduate Medical Courses would be permissible?—the bench noted

Reaching its decision, the SC bench observed that right from 1971 onwards till 2017, consistently it has approved and/or permitted the “Institutional Preference” in the Post Graduate Medical Courses. It further held that the introduction of the NEET has, as such, nothing to do with any preference/Institutional Preference, more particularly the “Institutional Preference”. The bench observed:

It is required to be noted that introduction of the NEET has, as such, nothing to do with any preference/Institutional Preference, more particularly the “Institutional Preference” as approved by this Court time and again. The purpose and object of the introduction of the NEET was to conduct a uniform entrance examination for all medical educational institutions at the under­graduate level or post- graduate level and admissions at the under­graduate level and post­graduate level are to be given solely on the basis of the merits and/or marks obtained in the NEET examination only. It is required to be noted that earlier the respective universities including the Gujarat University used to hold examination for post­graduate admission to medical courses and now instead of such tests by the Gujarat University/concerned universities, merit is to be determined on the basis of the NEET examination results only and admissions are required to be given on the basis of such merits or marks obtained in NEET. The only obligation by virtue of introduction of NEET is that, once centralized admission test is conducted, the State, its agencies, universities and institutions cannot hold any separate test for the purpose of admission to Post­Graduate and PG and Diploma Courses and such seats are to be filled up by the State agencies, universities/institutions for preparing merit list as per the score obtained by the applicants in NEET examination and therefore by introduction of the NEET, Section 10D of the MCI, Act has been amended, consequently amendment to the Post­Graduate Education Regulations, 2000, admission to Post Graduate Courses are made providing for solely on the basis of the score secured by the candidates seeking admission based on centralized examination, i.e., NEET.

Even while giving admissions in the State quota/institutional reservation quota, still the admissions are required to be given on the basis of the merits determined on the basis of the NEET examination results. Under the circumstances, introduction of the NEET Scheme, as such, has nothing to do with the “Institutional Preference”. Therefore, the change by introduction of the NEET Scheme shall not affect the Institutional Preference/Reservation as approved by this Court from time to time in catena of decisions, more particularly the decisions referred to hereinabove. Under the guise of introduction of the NEET Scheme, the petitioners cannot be permitted to re­agitate and/or re­open the issue with respect to Institutional Preference which has been approved and settled by this Court in catena of decisions, more particularly the decisions referred to hereinabove.

In its verdict on the case, the apex court held that as per the observations in its hearing and decisions of court made in previous cases:

Institutional Preference to the extent of 50% is approved and it is observed and held that introduction of the NEET Scheme shall not affect such Institutional Preference/Reservation. Such a regulation providing 50% Institutional Preference/Reservation shall not be in any way ultra vires to Section 10D of the MCI Act. Even otherwise, as observed hereinabove, even in the case of Institutional Preference/Reservation, the admissions in the post graduate courses are to be given on the basis of the merits and marks obtained in the NEET examination result only.

Read Also: NO MCI Permission: Supreme Court dismisses Mulayam Singh Yadav Medical College SLP

Attached is the detailed judgment below



Source: self
1 comment(s) on NEET PG 2020: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Institutional quota in PG Medical admissions

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. I think that The supreme court of india will give the verdict and give order that the uniform fees structure in all private medical colleges or deemed university of the country in MD/MS course in all clinical subjects irrespective of the clinical subject and the name of the private medical colleges, and it should be reasonable. For example, at present -a MS orthopaedics course fees structure is much more than MS ENT in a private medical colleges but if supreme court give importance to the merit basis NEET PG then this fees must be same in all clinical subjects just like Govt medical colleges. Not only that all the private medical colleges in india must have the same fees structure in a particular subjects, other than that the supreme court verdict is violating all the way. i will drawing the attention of supreme court and the honorable lawyer of the country.

Bajaj Doctor Loan