This site is intended for Healthcare professionals.

Hiring of Medical Faculty: Show Cause notice to Baba Farid University of Health Sciences VC

education medical dialogues

It was averred that appointment letters had been issued in violation of the undertaking given before the court, and no advertisement was issued.

Chandigarh: Asking as to why no strict action should be taken against them, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued show cause notice to the Vice-Chancellor of Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, on account of not complying with the High Court’s earlier directive.

According to a recent report by Tribune, the HC took this action considering the petition filed by Dr Manjit Singh Jaura alleging irregularities in the hiring process at the medical institute.

Advertisement

In the year 2013, a petition was filed by one H S Nagra stating that most of the appointments in the Baba Farid University of Health Sciences were made without following any procedure as provided under Section 47 of the Baba Farid University of Health Sciences Act, 1998. “No public notice or advertisement is given inviting applications and most of the persons, who are appointed, are over-aged. They are appointed on contract basis and are allowed to continue for number of years.”

Read Also: Discrepancies in Affidavits: Medical College Principal, Secretary MED told to appear in court

................................ Advertisement ................................

Further, in May 2014, the university promised to adhere to the compulsory hiring procedures as directed by the HC. Relevant submission by the university are mentioned as under:

“… All appointments, teaching and non-teaching, in the University and its constituent colleges will henceforth be made on the basis of selection by duly constituted Selection Committees in pursuance to advertisement in leading national newspapers as also on the University website. The eligibility criteria for the post(s) will be based on the norms/criteria, if any, laid down in the Baba Farid University of Health Sciences Act or by the relevant Apex statutory bodies like the Medical Council of India/Dental Council of India/Indian Nursing Council, or the State Government of Punjab…”

However, it has been purported that the university has not adhered to the High Court. Hence, the petitioner moved the court where the counsel on behalf of him pointed out that the writ petition was disposed of with clear-cut directions to the university regarding the framing of rules/regulations and making all appointments after advertising the posts.

It was averred that appointment letters had been issued in violation of the undertaking given before the court, and no advertisement was issued.

Read Also: Compulsory Bond Service: High Court takes away Relief given to MD Pulmonology passout under IMS

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issues before the Bench were “whether the respondents had made themselves liable to be proceeded and punished under the Contempt of Courts Act and other relevant law by making appointment of a doctor and another person and re-designating another doctor against the directions of the High Court in May 2014.”

Taking cognizance of the issue, the bench of Honourable Justice Nirmaljit Kaur issued show cause notices to Dr Raj Bahadur, VC at the University and two other respondents asking as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them in a service matter, reports Tribune.

Read Also: 150 MBBS students of Subharti Medical College should be Shifted: MCI tells court

Share


Source: with inputs

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. Dr. Raj Bahadur has also shown fraudulent appointment/promotion of Dr. Vidur Bhalla, a Medical Officer from Punjab State Govt. to post of Reader(Urology)/Associate Professor on 3rd extended deputation, as his promotion through the UPSC to grant him illegal higher salary and additional increments. I have complained to each and every authorities but nothing has been done, as he is highly influential doctor. The initial deputation of Dr Vidur Bhalla, AMO from Punjab State Govt. to post of Medical Officer in GMSH-16 under Chandigarh Administration as Medical Officer in year 2007 was also done without his serving of 05 years Study-bond executed to Punjab State Govt. before he proceeded for His MCh(Urology) as PGIMER, Chandigarh as sponsored candidate. However, now this bond has been also shown to be expired through some fraudulent order that too without his serving of this study bond in Punjab State Govt. for even single month. His illegal appointment as Senior Lecturer(Urology)/ Assistant Professor on his 2nd extended deputation in year 2011 and then fraudulent appointment/promotion as Reader(Urology)/Associate Professor on 3rd extended deputation in year 2012 without his serving 2 years \’cooling off\’ period before each deputation is also violation of terms & conditions of deputation as laid in Punjab Civil Service Rules. But, in violation of rules, Dr Vidur Bhalla is being granted extensions for last 13 years and genuine candidate are being denied promotion as well higher pay by Chandigarh Administration in GMCH-32. Only those doctors who are highly connected get promotion in GMCH-32 and remaining are left to fight in various court or made salient by initiating false inquiry against them. There is no place for rule/regulations in GMCH-32 under Chandigarh Administration.

  2. Dr Raj Bahadur has also appointed one Dr. Vidur Bhalla, a Medical Officer from Punjab State Government as Senior Lecturer/Assistant on deputation in violation of MCI Regulation, UPSC Guidelines and the terms & condition of the advertisement for the post. in Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Sector-32, Chandigarh in year 2011. Later in year 2012, he promoted Dr. Vidur Bhalla, a Medical Officer to post of Reader/Associate Professor on deputation in violation of MCI Regulation, UPSC Guidelines and the terms & condition of the advertisement for the post. in Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Sector-32, Chandigarh. A petition is pending in CAT court since year 2016 but no action to date. All proof has already been attached in OA No.060/00434/2018

................................ Advertisement ................................

Advertisement